Pregunta escribió:Rule Question:
> Hi,
> We have a doubt with Crooked Attorney
>
>
> Type: Character Faction: Syndicate
> Cost: 2 Skill: 4 Icons:
> Game Text:
> Independent.
> Villainous.
> Day. It is Day. Destroy all Night cards.
> Each Criminal character you control gains [Arcane] and +1 skill.
> Flavor Text: "Your Honor, my client has no recollection of murdering anyone."
> Set: DotU
> Number: 17
> Illustrator: Alexandre Dainche
>
> Usually, a Day or Night character have this text:
> "Night, It is Night. After comes into play, destroy all Day cards"
>
> A Day or Night character destroy opposite stated when come into play.
>
> But Crooked Attorney is written as passive effect without "after comes into play".
>
> Is this correct? And, if it is correct, what happens if I have a Crooked Attorney in play and my opponent play a night character? I see Savio Corvi is in the FAQ.Perhaps Crooked Attorney have the same mistake?
Y la respuesta oficial es la siguiente
Respuesta oficial escribió:Conflicting passive effects are determined in order according to the active player, so it would work just as normal (for the record both are passive effects, they are just worded slightly differently allowing for the Syndicate player to determine whether or not they actually want to get rid of the Night cards, since Syndicate uses both Day and Night cards).
Es decir, los conflictos entre efectos pasivos son determinados en orden decidido por el jugador activo. Ambos son efectos pasivos, pero están escritos de forma ligeramente diferente para que el Sindicato pueda determinar si deshacerse o no de las cartas de Noche, ya que Sindicato utiliza tanto las cartas de Día como de Noche.
Es decir, lo que comentaba Loprw
Loprw escribió:Una vez que la carta entra en juego, y llega el momento de resolver los efectos pasivos, el jugador activo decide si la pasiva del Crooked va primero o la pasiva de la otra carta. Una vez se resuelve la primera, la segunda desaparece porque la carta en cuestión ya no está en juego.
